Emilien Demanet vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 05 Aug at 06:49 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Demanet vs C. Emil Overbeck

Emilien Demanet
Emilien Demanet

Flag BEL BEL

w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
Carl Emil Overbeck
Carl Emil Overbeck

Flag DEN DEN

w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

20
Age
24
-
Height
-
593
C. Rank
747
515
Best Rank
747
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Demanet 1 - 0 Overbeck

They have played 2 sets in total, with Emilien Demanet winning 2 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 0. The last match between Emilien Demanet and Carl Emil Overbeck was at the M15 Eupen, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Emilien Demanet getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Demanet1
Overbeck0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1M15 Eupen(08-05-25)

Clay
BEL Flag
Emilien Demanet
6
6
DEN Flag
Carl Emil Overbeck
4
3

E. Demanet vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
55.38% (72-58)Career Total W/L64.47% (49-27)
1Clay0
3Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

E. Demanet vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:

  • The recent performance on the second serve shows Overbeck slightly ahead, winning 42.86% of points compared to Demanet's 42.34%. Could this fine margin play a crucial role in the match outcome? It's possible, given its correlation with predicting match results.
  • Analyzing return game stats, Overbeck exhibits a definitive edge by capturing 51% of points on opponents' second serves, versus Demanet's 44.74%. However, Demanet is marginally better with first serve returns at 33.75%, compared to Overbeck's 32.45%.
  • Under pressure, Overbeck has proven slightly more resilient by saving 51.28% of breakpoints compared to Demanet's 47.81%. This factor may influence crucial moments in a tighter matchup.
  • Over their last year's performance, Demanet has a slightly higher win rate of 56.92% compared to Overbeck's 52.94%. What could this imply? Demanet seems more consistent in winning matches over time.
  • Demanet thrives on Hard surfaces with a 57% win rate, while Overbeck excels on Clay, winning 63%. Interestingly, both have shown vulnerabilities on their weaker surfaces, with Overbeck at 50% on Hard, hinting at possible challenges if the match occurs on that surface.
  • Both players frequently compete at the ITF Futures level, with Overbeck earning a higher win percentage of 60% relative to Demanet's 57.81%. Overbeck's slight edge could suggest better adaptability or superior competition handling at this tier.
  • Regarding opponent quality, Overbeck faces higher-ranked players, averaging 346.47 in rank, which might provide a marginal competitive edge due to exposure against tougher competition, compared to Demanet's average of 402.12.
  • In matches stretching into deciding sets, Overbeck shows fortitude, securing victories in 50% of them, surpassing Demanet's 41%. Could this indicate greater mental toughness or endurance in potentially close matches? Perhaps.
  • Notably, when it comes to converting break points, Overbeck's success rate of 42.11% stands above Demanet's 35.68%, a critical statistic that could shift momentum in pivotal stages of the match.
  • Evaluating their current event performances can provide additional insights, so scrutinizing their most recent matches might further reveal their form leading into this encounter.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match features Demanet and Overbeck, players with distinct strengths and recent form indicators favoring different aspects of their game. Despite Demanet's slightly superior overall win rate over the past year, Overbeck's performance in specific categories such as return games, break point proficiency, and experience against relatively stronger opponents gives him subtle leverage.

Interestingly, their effectiveness under pressure and in deciding sets might be pivotal, with Overbeck demonstrating a stronger mental edge. Additionally, since this match could materialize on a Hard surface, it slightly tilts the dynamics toward Demanet, given his comfort on this surface.

However, brokering a comprehensive evaluation of these variables, considering Overbeck's agility in return games and decisive climaxes, he could very well be the preferable favorite to win this encounter, albeit potentially a close contest.

Thus, based on these analytical interpretations, Overbeck appears more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis matchup.

Emilien Demanet vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Demanet vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won7
2Aces (Total)1
2Total Double Faults2
1:24:39Average Match Time1:24:39
61% (34/56)1st Serve %67% (39/58)
53% (18/34)1st Serve Win %56% (22/39)
59% (13/22)2nd Serve Win %26% (5/19)
67% (6/9)Break Pts Won %67% (4/6)
53% (31/58)Return Points Win %45% (25/56)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Demanet 50%, Overbeck 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Demanet 56%, Overbeck 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Demanet 54%, Overbeck 55%.

E. Demanet Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Vale do Lobo - 10-11-2025

QF

GBRA. Gray
L
6-3 6-4

R2

NEDJ. Jans
W
6-1 7-5

R1

PORP. Araujo
W
6-2 6-1
HardM25 Sintra - 27-10-2025

R2

POLD. Michalski
L
6-3 6-4

R1

PORT. Torres
W
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3

C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardSydney Challenger - 17-11-2025

Q1

NZLA. Klintcharov
W
6-3 6-2
HardBrisbane 3 Challenger - 10-11-2025

QF

TPET. Wu
L
6-3 6-4

R2

JPNL. Vithoontien
W
6-2 7-6(1)

R1

AUSP. Sekulic
W
6-3 6-3

Q3

AUSH. Jones
W
6-4 6-2
banner

E. Demanet vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
55.38% (72/58)YTD Win/Loss64.47% (49/27)
55.71% (161/128)Sets Win/Loss61.54% (104/65)
52.15% (1418/1301)Games Win/Loss54.97% (869/712)
56.14% (32/25)Hard Win/Loss73.91% (17/6)
57.35% (39/29)Clay Win/Loss60.42% (29/19)
20.00% (1/4)Indoor Hard W/L60.00% (3/2)
0.15Aces Per Game0.32
198Aces Total243
0.12Double Faults Per Game0.22
156Total Double Faults172
1:47:43Average Match Time1:13:11
443.17Average Opponent Rank324.28
67% (5438/8142)1st Serve %64% (2408/3753)
62% (3375/5438)1st Serve Win %68% (1639/2408)
50% (1361/2704)2nd Serve Win %47% (636/1345)
48% (467/971)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (181/411)
44% (3752/8451)Return Points Win %42% (1579/3741)
0.00% (0/1)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
60.00% (3/2)Challenger W/L55.56% (5/4)
55.65% (69/55)Futures W/L65.67% (44/23)
54% (69/127)Best of 3 Sets Win %64% (49/76)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
52% (17/33)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)50% (6/12)
37% (11/30)Deciding Set Win %65% (11/17)
86% (78/67)1st Set Won, Won Match95% (43/41)
14% (78/11)1st Set Won, Lost Match5% (43/2)
10% (52/5)1st Set Lost, Won Match24% (33/8)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:05 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
AUSP. Marinkov
DENC. E. Overbeck
W1
2.93
W2
1.34
02:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
UKRO. Prihodko
BELB. Gadamauri
W1
1.81
W2
1.87
12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Bondioli
ITAF. Moroni
W1
2.06
W2
1.666
12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Arnaboldi
CANA. Donski
W1
1.89
W2
1.79
06:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
COLS. Price
BRAE. C. Lima
W1
1.81
W2
1.87
03:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
NZLA. Rai
GBRE. Hudd
W1
1.98
W2
1.72